ReviewGeoHealth2026
Spatiotemporal Approaches to Assess the Association of Environmental Risk Factors With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Scoping Review.
Review in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a leading cause of mortality globally, with environmental risk factors playing a significant role in their prevalence. This review aims to critically evaluate the current methodologies employed in spatiotemporal analyses of CVDs and provides recommendations to enhance the accuracy and practical application of these models. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies were selected based on their use of spatiotemporal models to assess the relationship between environmental factors and CVDs. We evaluated the methodological quality of included studies using the Spatial Methodology Appraisal of Research Tool (SMART). Significant challenges were noted, including the need for higher spatial resolution data sets and improved methods for addressing the modifiable areal and temporal unit problems and ecological bias. Additionally, the visualization of spatiotemporal data remains underutilized and underdeveloped, limiting the practical utility of the findings. We also discuss combining parameters to form an indicator that better represents environmental conditions, as well as cases where ground, satellite, or modeled data products are suitable. These recommendations could extend to other acquired chronic diseases and their relationship with environmental risk factors to improve the utility of spatiotemporal models. While spatiotemporal modeling holds considerable promise in understanding and mitigating CVD risks associated with environmental factors, appropriate data selection, addressing methodological pitfalls and reporting spatial and temporal model outcomes are necessary to enhance their reliability and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.