ArticleResearch square2025
Rapid Review of Gender-Affirming Healthcare for Children and Adolescents: Evidence Synthesis (2021-2025) and Recommendations for South Africa.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Why we need this rapid review: In South Africa, transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) children and adolescents continue to navigate health systems shaped by deep inequalities, limited specialised services, and persistent stigma. What the evidence shows: Across 200 peer-reviewed research articles, 29 systematic reviews and 4 rigorous technical reports included in this rapid review, one picture emerges clearly, a picture that resonates with common sense, lived experience, and the stories told by TGD youth across the country. When TGD young people receive gender-affirming care within supportive families schools communities and clinical settings they do better emotionally socially and medically: 1.An affirming home, an accepting teacher, a safe clinic, or a supportive friend can dramatically reduce distress, depression, and feelings of isolation. Young people become more confident, more hopeful, and more connected to their communities. Their school attendance improves. Their relationships deepen. Their sense of belonging grows. Non-clinical delays long waiting lists service gaps and administrative barriers worsen distress and mental-health outcomes: 2.Internationally, these structural barriers are consistently linked to poorer wellbeing for TGD youth. In South Africa, many delays have nothing to do with safety or clinical readiness, they stem from limited staffing, uneven provincial capacity, referral bottlenecks, and financial constraints. For young people, these delays are not neutral. They often result in worsening anxiety, deepened dysphoria, and increased risk of self-harm or suicidality. Puberty pausers and gender-affirming hormones work as expected when monitored by specialists: 3.Puberty pausers do not override who a child is; rather, they give young people Surgery for young people under 18 is rare almost all evidence relates to chest reconstruction for transmasculine youth: 4.These surgeries are not undertaken lightly, are generally only offered to older adolescents, and are far less common than some public discussions suggest. When masculinising chest surgery is offered, it shows low complication rates and high satisfaction. Many young people report significant improvements in body image, participation in daily life, and overall wellbeing. Policies matter: 5.Policies shape lives. They decide whether a young person can change their name at school, whether a clinic has clear protocols, whether there is protection against discrimination, or whether a family must fight through unnecessary red tape. A South African lens: Almost all of the global research on GAHC for youth comes from high-income countries, places with more specialised services, shorter waiting times, and stronger safety nets than those available to most South Africans. Yet the findings are still clear and relevant when interpreted through a local lens. South African youth often face added burdens: 1.Poverty, community violence, discrimination, school-based exclusion, xenophobia, racism, homophobia, and limited access to specialised care all intersect to shape the mental health of TGD young people. These realities amplify the need for safe, affirming services, they do not diminish it. Most medical schemes do not cover GAHC: 2.Even families with medical aid often face high out-of-pocket costs. For many, this makes care inaccessible, reinforcing historical patterns of inequity. Nodal disparities across provinces deepen inequality: 3.Some provinces have dedicated clinicians, while others rely on referral pathways that stretch across hundreds of kilometres. Rural youth often carry the heaviest burden, travelling long distances, missing school, or facing stigma when trying to access support. Our histories matter: 4.South Africa's past left a legacy of fragmented health systems and unequal access. But it also left a legacy of resilience, community solidarity, and a collective instinct to protect our most vulnerable.This makes affirming, timely, and coordinated care even more essential here, not less. Limitations of the evidence: The evidence base is growing, but not perfect, and it is important for families and communities to understand its limitations without misinterpreting them: Most studies are observational, meaning they reflect real-world experiences rather than controlled clinical trials.Follow-up periods are short, especially for adolescents whose needs evolve rapidly over time.Non-binary and neurodivergent youth remain underrepresented, even though they make up an important part of our community.Very few studies come from the Global South, including African nations, where cultural contexts, resource constraints, and support systems differ.Randomised trials are not feasible in this field, given the small population, inability to blind participants or prevent them from accessing related interventions, and the ethical concerns of withholding needed care.These limitations reflect gaps and constraints in the global research landscape, not a lack of benefit. Instead, they highlight the importance of building a stronger African evidence base in the years ahead. Conclusion What this means for South Africa: The findings are remarkably consistent: Gender-affirming healthcare is effective and life-enhancing for young people who want it, with established safety profiles under professional care.This rapid review supports the continued implementation and strengthening of the SAHCS GAHC Guideline. It also calls for policies and services that uphold the constitutional rights, dignity, and humanity of TGD youth.But beyond the science, there is a deeper message for us as a country: When a child is affirmed, they are more likely to stay in school, maintain strong family bonds, build a sense of belonging, and grow into adults who contribute meaningfully to their communities. When a child is denied care and support, we risk losing them to despair, to disconnection, or to preventable harm. The message is simple: When we affirm, young people thrive. When we delay or deny, they suffer.This review is a reminder that every young person deserves care that sees them, respects them, and allows them to grow into who they truly are without fear. It is a call to parents, teachers, health professionals, faith leaders, policymakers, and community members to walk alongside our youth with compassion and clarity.In the spirit of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.