ArticleResearch square2025
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Perceived Usefulness of the School eHealth Education Program Pakistan (eSHEPP) for Improving Adolescents' Awareness of Noncommunicable Diseases in Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are a leading cause of premature morbidity and mortality, and many risk behaviors emerge during adolescence. In Pakistan, school health education remains limited and primarily didactic, leaving adolescents insufficiently equipped to adopt healthy behaviors. To address this gap, the School eHealth Education Program Pakistan (eSHEPP), a multimedia, app-supported intervention, was developed. This study aimed to explore secondary and higher secondary students' perceptions of eSHEPP's acceptability, feasibility, and perceived usefulness in increasing awareness of NCDs following program delivery in school settings. Methods: A qualitative explanatory study, guided by an integrated Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) framework, was conducted in four schools (two secondary, two higher secondary; two all-girls, two all-boys) in Karachi. eSHEPP was delivered over eight weeks through six classroom-based sessions. Each 20-30-minute session included a 7-10-minute dramatized video, followed by guided discussion and interactive Q&A led by a trained facilitator and teacher representative. A total of 27 students participated in four focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted after program completion. Data were collected using piloted semi-structured guides in Urdu and analyzed thematically using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach in NVivo, following COREQ guidelines. Results: Students described eSHEPP as highly acceptable and user-friendly, appreciating the dramatized videos, clear language, and supportive subtitles. Most participants reported increased awareness of NCDs and risk factors, healthier dietary choices, greater recognition of the importance of physical activity, and peer-led discouragement of smoking. The program's smooth integration into school schedules and minimal resource demands (technological and personnel) enhanced perceived feasibility. Participants suggested expanding health topics, slightly extending session duration, and incorporating interactive features such as quizzes, games, and peer-engagement tools to sustain interest. Conclusions: eSHEPP demonstrated strong acceptability, high feasibility, and clear educational value in under-resourced Pakistani schools. With refinements in interactivity and delivery, and formal integration into school curricula supported by teachers and parents, eSHEPP has the potential to be a scalable and sustainable model for adolescent health promotion in low-resource settings. Future studies should evaluate long-term outcomes using mixed-method and longitudinal designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.