ArticleResearch square2025
CauReL: Dynamic Counterfactual Learning for Precision Drug Repurposing in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease has few effective therapies, and decades of amyloid- and tau-focused trials have delivered only modest benefit with substantial toxicity. Drug repurposing using real-world data offers a faster and lower-risk route to new treatments, yet current approaches typically average effects across populations, model disease onset and progression separately, and provide little insight into which patients are most likely to benefit. We present CauReL, a dynamic counterfactual representation learning framework that enables transparent, patient specific estimation of treatment effects from large-scale electronic health records for precision drug repurposing in AD. CauReL first learns balanced latent representations of treated and untreated patients using Integral Probability Metric regularization, then jointly predicts two clinically linked outcomes, incident AD and time from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD, to generate paired counterfactual outcomes for every individual. A counterfactual explanation module quantifies how clinical features shape benefit at the patient level, and uplift trees transform complex heterogeneity into simple, rule-based subgroups suitable for trial enrichment and clinical decision support. Using independent cohorts from OneFlorida+ and All of Us, we screened outpatient prescriptions with at least 20 percent exposure among 28,605 individuals with mild cognitive impairment, of whom 4,990 progressed to Alzheimer's disease. CauReL substantially improved covariate balance and distributional overlap across drug cohorts and achieved strong predictive accuracy for both incidence (AUC greater than 0.90) and progression timing (C index 0.81 to 0.84; Spearman 0.80 to 0.86). Twenty drugs showed consistent protective associations, with four emerging as highly reproducible across both networks, the metabolic agents liraglutide and empagliflozin and the neuroactive agents entacapone and amantadine. These drugs were associated with meaningful absolute risk reductions and clinically significant delays in progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Metabolic drugs produced the strongest benefits in individuals with diabetes, obesity, or cardiovascular disease, whereas neuroactive drugs provided broadly consistent protection across most subgroups. CauReL is available as an open source Python package with a companion web server for direct application to new cohorts or disease settings (https://caurel.site/). This work delivers a scalable and interpretable framework for prioritizing repurposable drugs and designing targeted clinical trials for the patients most likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.