ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Development and validation of machine learning models based on blood routine tests and tumor markers in early screening of primary bronchogenic lung cancer.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary bronchogenic lung cancer (PBLC) poses a serious threat to human health with its high mortality rate largely attributed to challenges in reliable early detection. Hence, the early identification of PBLC is essential for subsequent patient treatment. Machine learning (ML) models that utilize accessible data, such as routine blood tests and tumor markers, present a promising approach for enhancing early screening rates. This study aims to construct an ML prediction model based on the combined analysis of routine blood tests and tumor markers and to establish an early intelligent screening platform for PBLC through systematic integration and development of technology so as to improve the early screening rate of PBLC. Methods: This study used samples from the PBLC group and the healthy control (HC) group from 2018 to 2023 (n=1,054). Data from The Affiliated Dazu's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were used for model construction and internal validation (n=767), and data from the Chongqing Dazu District People's Hospital Medical Community were used for external validation (n=287). After feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, 14 features were selected, including routine blood tests and tumor markers. Subsequently, 10 ML models were used to establish prediction models using eight evaluation metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), to develop an early PBLC prediction tool. Results: Among multiple ML models for early prediction of PBLC in patients, the Xtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model achieved an AUC above 0.980 in both internal and external validation. Basophils, lymphocytes, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ranked highest in feature importance for early PBLC prediction, suggesting that the indicators from routine blood tests and tumor markers jointly influence the predictive performance, thereby underscoring the practicality of integrating these two types of indicators in model development. Conclusions: The ML models developed possess substantial application value in the early screening of PBLC, which is beneficial for the prompt detection and treatment of individuals diagnosed with PBLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.