ReviewCureus2025
Shedding Light on Depth: A Meta-analysis of Light Versus Deep Anaesthesia and Postoperative Neurocognitive Outcomes in Elderly Surgical Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative delirium (POD) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) are common and serious complications in elderly surgical patients, especially after prolonged procedures. Recent evidence suggests that the depth of anaesthesia may influence the risk of these adverse outcomes. This meta-analysis examined whether light versus deep anaesthesia affects the incidence of POD and POCD, as well as recovery measures such as time to post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge and length of hospital stay in elderly patients. A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English up to May 24, 2025, involving patients aged ≥60 years undergoing major surgery. The outcomes evaluated were POD, POCD, PACU discharge time, and hospital stay. Meta-analyses were conducted using random- or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity. Eight RCTs with a total of 1,957 elderly patients were included. Light anaesthesia was associated with a significantly lower incidence of POD (OR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.41-0.66; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%). The incidence of POCD was also reduced with light anaesthesia (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39-0.77; P = 0.0005; I² = 15%). Time to PACU discharge was shorter under light anaesthesia (mean difference (MD) = -9.43 minutes; 95% CI: -12.87 to -5.99; P < 0.00001; I² = 66%). Although hospital stay showed a trend favouring light anaesthesia (MD = -0.81 days; 95% CI: -1.85 to 0.24; P = 0.13), this result was not statistically significant (I² = 89%). Overall, light anaesthesia appears to reduce the incidence of POD and POCD and is associated with faster early recovery in elderly surgical patients. The observed trend toward shorter hospital stays did not reach significance. These findings indicate potential benefits of lighter anaesthetic strategies, though they should not be interpreted as evidence of direct causation, as other factors such as anaesthetic drug type and surgical invasiveness may also contribute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.