ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2026
Clinical Outcomes and Patient Profiles in the UK Medical Cannabis Registry: A k-Means Clustering Analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cannabis-Based Medicinal Products for Endometriosis: A 2-Year Prospective Analysis From the UK Medical Cannabis Registry.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a paucity of high-quality evidence on the clinical efficacy of cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs). The objective of this study was to perform trajectory k-means clustering of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in patients prescribed CBMPs to identify distinct response patterns and baseline predictors of treatment outcomes over 24 months. A cohort study of patients enrolled in the UK Medical Cannabis Registry with any qualifying indication was performed. Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures including EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale (SQS), at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Longitudinal k-means clustering was performed on EQ-5D-5L index values where the optimal number of clusters was selected via the gap statistic. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses identified predictors of cluster membership. The 8945 patients were included in the analysis, from which 10 distinct trajectory clusters were identified, with eight demonstrating HRQoL improvements representing 77.72% of the cohort (n = 6952). Over 70% of participants reported improved EQ-5D-5L index values at each timepoint, whilst 54.21% (n = 4849) and 44.07% (n = 3942) achieved clinically significant improvements in GAD-7 and SQS at 24 months, respectively. Adverse events were reported by 13.65% (n = 1221) of patients, predominantly rated as mild (n = 4732; 42.31%) or moderate (n = 4860; 43.46%). Baseline patient characteristics, particularly treatment indication, severe anxiety, poor sleep quality, female sex, and cannabis-naïve status, were stronger predictors of favorable treatment response than product-specific factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.