ArticleCells2025
Exploring Consequences of Predator Stress on Behaviors of Mice Lacking Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 5 (TAAR5).
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies indicated a connection between trace amine-associated receptor 5 (TAAR5) and emotional behaviors related to anxiety and depression; however, the neurobiological basis of this link is still unclear. Using mutant TAAR5 knockout (TAAR5-KO) mice, we explored the consequences of receptor deletion on dopamine (DA) dynamics in the ventral striatum and stress-related behaviors. Voltammetric measurements of DA in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) coupled with electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) revealed that mice lacking TAAR5 display a greater DA release, while its reuptake is not affected. Behaviorally, mutants were significantly less anxious in the elevated plus maze (EPM) and consumed more sucrose in comparison with wild-type (WT) controls. The new object recognition test (NOR) did not uncover a difference between these genotypes. During predator (rat) stress exposure, mutant and WT mice showed quite distinct responses versus the behavior observed in stressless conditions. Control animals demonstrated a substantial increase in "freezing" (a sign of passive coping), while "running" and "exploring" patterns (signs of active coping) were significantly extended in mice lacking TAAR5. Short-term consequences of stress were explored 24 h following the predator exposure. The absence of TAAR5 did not prevent or reduce stress-induced anxiety in the EPM. In fact, the level of anxiety in mutants reached that observed in control mice. Furthermore, activity in NOR was significantly decreased in mice lacking TAAR5 but not in WT animals. On the other hand, predator exposure resulted in impaired NOR in the WT control, whereas mutants' performance was not altered. These findings indicate that TAAR5 deletion leads to significant DA imbalance, which might at least partly explain the better stress-coping strategy and other stress-induced behavioral consequences observed in mutant animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.