Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511330›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Therapeutic Antibodies in Hematology: Advances in Malignant and Non-Malignant Disorders.

Hiroshi Yasui, Masashi Idogawa, Tadao Ishida, Kohzoh Imai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiroshi YasuiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0905-6855
Masashi IdogawaDivision of Medical Genome Sciences, Department of Genomic and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8507-1726
Tadao IshidaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo 150-8935, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-3292
Kohzoh ImaiSapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP22H04923the Practical Research Project for Rare/Intractable Diseases of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 25ek0109807JP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic antibodies have revolutionized hematology, offering targeted and effective treatments for both malignant and non-malignant diseases. In hematologic malignancies, anti-CD20, anti-CD19, anti-CD38, and anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibodies have markedly improved survival outcomes, whereas antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies continue to expand therapeutic possibilities. Besides cancer, complement inhibitors such as eculizumab, ravulizumab, and the recently approved crovalimab have redefined paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome management, and the bispecific antibody emicizumab has transformed prophylaxis in hemophilia A. Furthermore, novel antibody formats such as the trifunctional anti-CD38 × CD3 antibody (Tri-31C2) exhibit enhanced anti-myeloma activity compared to chimeric CD38 antibodies, underscoring the future potential of T-cell-redirecting designs. This review summarizes key developments in therapeutic antibodies for hematological disorders, their action mechanisms, and emerging strategies to further optimize their efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

Hematologic DiseasesHematologic NeoplasmsHematologyAnimalsAntibodies, BispecificHumansAntibodies, Bispecificantibody–drug conjugatesantibody engineeringbispecific antibodieshematologytherapeutic antibody

Identifiers

PMID41511330
PMCPMC12786230

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.