In one paragraphArticle in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
13 authors.
Anna TorgashevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8933-8336 Lyubov MalinovskayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1519-3226 Miroslav NuriddinovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2417-8263 Kira S ZadesenetsInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-2973 Maria GridinaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7972-5949 Artem NurislamovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-1316 Svetlana KorablevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Inna PristyazhnyukInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0226-4213 Anastasiya ProskuryakovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3812-4853 Katerina V TishakovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7358-3612 Nikolay B RubtsovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-8057 Veniamin S FishmanInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-3100 Pavel BorodinInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6717-844X Funding
Russian Science Foundation 23-14-00182
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Chromosomal inversions and copy-number variants (CNVs) drive genomic and phenotypic diversification in birds by reshaping recombination, gene expression, and genome architecture. Here, we report a complex structural polymorphism on great tit (
Indexed as
ChromosomesGene RearrangementMeiosisPasseriformesAnimalsChromosome InversionDNA Copy Number Variationschromosomal inversionscopy number variation (CNV)FAM118Agenome evolutiongreat titHi-Crecombination suppressionstructural variation
Identifiers
PMID41511336
PMCPMC12786263
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390