Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511531›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Digital transformation in healthcare to strengthen patient autonomy].

Mona Rams, Stefanie Rudolph, Petya Zyumbileva, Claudia Grehn, Tamara Hussong Milagre, Nadja Will, Christof von Kalle

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mona RamsClinical Study Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Stefanie RudolphClinical Study Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Petya ZyumbilevaClinical Study Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Claudia GrehnClinical Study Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Tamara Hussong MilagrePatientenorganisation EVITA, Lissabon, Portugal.
Nadja Will, Bielefeld, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland.
Christof von KalleClinical Study Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. christof.kalle@bih-charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient autonomy is regarded as a central ethical and health policy principle of modern healthcare delivery. Its practical implementation is gaining increasing importance in light of the rapidly advancing digital transformation of the healthcare system. Digital technologies are changing the conditions under which autonomy can be exercised and safeguarded. They alter access to information and orientation within healthcare settings, thereby influencing individual decision-making processes. Against this backdrop, a purely individualistic concept of autonomy proves insufficient. For the digitalization of healthcare to meaningfully strengthen patient autonomy, it must go beyond technical and organisational implementation and include a conceptual and structural engagement with autonomy. This gives rise to a political and socio-structural design mandate that goes far beyond the introduction of individual applications. A consistent commitment to an expanded understanding of autonomy places substantial demands on the development and integration of digital infrastructures. Digital solutions must function reliably, reflect societal diversity, enable participation and support orientation. Safeguarding informational and participatory self-determination additionally requires an interplay of targeted political governance, coherent regulation, technically robust interoperability and socially responsive structural conditions. The aim of this article is to examine these requirements in detail and to profile them, with regard to a patient-oriented design of digital infrastructures, as an emancipatory mandate for a patient-centered health care system.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDigital TechnologyPatient ParticipationPersonal AutonomyGermanyHumansDigital self-determinationDigital technologiesHealth data useHealth policy frameworkParticipatory healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41511531
PMCPMC12852239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.