ArticlePloS one2026
Establishment of an amino acid metabolism related signature for prognostic and therapeutic sensitivity prediction in breast cancer by machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amino acid metabolism plays a critical role in tumor growth and immune regulation, yet its comprehensive function in breast cancer remains underexplored. We developed an amino acid metabolism-related gene signature (AAMRGS) to predict prognosis and therapeutic response in breast cancer. The AAMRGS was constructed using a machine-learning framework integrating ten algorithms and validated across multiple independent cohorts. It served as an independent prognostic factor and outperformed existing amino acid metabolism-related signatures and clinical variables. Moreover, the prognostic utility of AAMRGS was further validated across pan-cancer datasets, and an AAMRGS-based nomogram was constructed to facilitate clinical application. Functional enrichment and protein-protein interaction analyses revealed that AAMRGS genes were primarily involved in metabolic reprogramming and cell proliferation. Experimental validation confirmed the downregulation of key genes such as SAV1 and IGF2R in breast cancer cells. Integrative analyses revealed that the high-AAMRGS subgroup exhibited a greater copy number variation burden, higher tumor mutation burden (TMB), enrichment of immunosuppressive cell populations, and increased sensitivity to most chemotherapeutic drugs. In contrast, the low-AAMRGS subgroup displayed higher immune scores, stronger immune activation, enrichment of anti-tumor immune cells, and greater responsiveness to immunotherapy. Collectively, our findings establish AAMRGS as a reliable prognostic signature and a potential tool to guide individualized therapeutic strategies for breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.