Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511952›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Global burden and projections of cervical cancer attributable to unsafe sex and smoking, 1990-2034.

Jie Hu, Yajie Wang, Yan Liu, Zhengrong Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie HuXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yajie WangSchool of Public Health, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Yan LiuSchool of Public Health, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Zhengrong CaiClinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3025-7263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze global trends and attributable risks (smoking and unsafe sex) in disease burden of cervical cancer from 1990 to 2034, considering different sociodemographic index (SDI) levels.

methodsData from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study was utilized. Quantile regression, restricted cubic spline, and Nordpred models were applied to analyze the relationship between cervical cancer age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs), age-standardized Disability-Adjusted Life Years rates (ASDRs) and SDI, and predicted future trends.

resultsFrom 1990 to 2019, global cervical cancer ASMR declined but the total deaths increased. Unsafe sex accounted for the highest disease burden, particularly in low-SDI regions, followed by smoking. By 2034, ASMR attributed to unsafe sex and smoking is projected to further decrease globally, but an upward trend is expected in specific regions including India (unsafe sex), China (smoking) and Russian Federation (unsafe sex and smoking).

conclusionUnsafe sex is the leading risk factor for cervical cancer. Targeted strategies are needed for distinct age groups: enhanced prevention and screening for those aged 55-59 years, and optimized care for adults aged over 95 years. The key interventions, including HPV vaccination, screening, and smoking cessation programs, remain critical in low and low-middle SDI areas.

Indexed as

SmokingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41511952
PMCPMC12788690

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.