Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41511983›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evaluating the clinical care, quality of life and overall experiences of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) during the pandemic: A Canadian mixed-methods study.

Elizabeth Baguley, Madelyn Knaub, Jessica VanDyke, Gideon Hirschfield, Mark G Swain, Gail Wright, Deirdre McCaughey, Abdel Aziz Shaheen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth BaguleyUniversity of Calgary, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1363-3268
Madelyn KnaubUniversity of Calgary, Ward of the 21st Century (W21C), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8844-5669
Jessica VanDykeUniversity of Calgary, Ward of the 21st Century (W21C), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gideon HirschfieldToronto Centre for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark G SwainUniversity of Calgary, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gail WrightCanadian PBC Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Deirdre McCaugheyUniversity of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abdel Aziz ShaheenUniversity of Calgary, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2940-897X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pandemic restrictions impacted healthcare, particularly during the first year. We evaluated the impact of the pandemic on quality of life and clinical care among patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This mixed-methods study administered quality of life surveys (Fear of COVID-19 Scale [FCV-19S], EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level [EQ-5D-3L], 29-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrument Survey [PROMIS-29]) and a PBC Care Delivery questionnaire to 348 Canadian PBC patients, followed by two focus groups with patients (n = 14) and stakeholders (n = 3). Quality of life scores were compared among sub-groups (i.e., care delays and pandemic appointment type) and with various reference populations. Most participants were female (94.0%) and Caucasian (88.2%), with a median age of 63.0 years (IQR: 55.9-71.2). During the pandemic, 75.8% had the majority (≥ 50%) of their hepatologist appointments virtually, but only 22.4% preferred to continue with virtual care post-pandemic. Participants with care delays had worse scores on the FCV-19S (p = 0.014), EQ-5D-3L (p = 0.009), and PROMIS-29 (i.e., fatigue, anxiety, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, p < 0.01), compared to those without care delays. PBC patients had worse PROMIS-29 scores compared to a general population (p < 0.01). Both patients and stakeholders stressed the importance of in-person appointments, while recognizing a role for virtual appointments post-pandemic. PBC patients' quality of life worsened during the pandemic, especially those with delayed care. Most PBC patients expressed a preference for in-person appointments post-pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Liver Cirrhosis, BiliaryQuality of LifeAgedCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41511983
PMCPMC12788631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.