ArticlePloS one2026
Endocrine advantages of PD-1/PD-L1 therapy: Comparative analysis of FAERS-JADER.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the extensive clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with these agents have increasingly garnered significant attention. Unlike other irAEs, endocrine irAEs are mostly irreversible, with variable and nonspecific symptoms, which poses challenges for clinicians in diagnosis. As a result, this study leveraged the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) pharmacovigilance databases to conduct an in-depth investigation into adverse events induced by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, with a focus on irAEs induced by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. This study pioneers the systematic cross-database validation of endocrine irAEs induced by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The integration of data from the JADER offers unique safety insights for Asian populations, bolsters global pharmacovigilance efforts, and uncovers regional variations in irAEs reporting. Notably, this study revealed a higher prevalence of endocrine irAEs among men aged over 50 years receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are strongly associated with thyroid dysfunction, adrenal insufficiency, and pituitary inflammation. Additionally, it identifies several previously undocumented endocrine irAEs. This result unearthed safety signals hitherto unreported in drug inserts, underscoring the imperative for updating the safety labeling of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with respect to endocrine irAEs. The emergence of off-label uses further underscores the need for additional clinical trials to assess their efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.