ArticlePloS one2026
Image generator for tabular data based on non-Euclidean metrics for CNN-based classification.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tabular data is the predominant format for statistical analysis and machine learning across domains such as finance, biomedicine, and environmental sciences. However, conventional methods often face challenges when dealing with high dimensionality and complex nonlinear relationships. In contrast, deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), are well-suited for automatic feature extraction and achieve high predictive accuracy, but are primarily designed for image-based inputs. This study presents a comparative evaluation of non-Euclidean distance metrics within the Image Generator for Tabular Data (IGTD) framework, which transforms tabular data into image representations for CNN-based classification. While the original IGTD relies on Euclidean distance, we extend the framework to adopt alternative metrics, including one minus correlation, Geodesic distance, Jensen-Shannon distance, Wasserstein distance, and Tropical distance. These metrics are designed to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among features. Through systematic experiments on both simulated and real-world genomics datasets, we compare the performance of each distance metric in terms of classification accuracy and structural fidelity of the generated images. The results demonstrate that non-Euclidean metrics can significantly improve the effectiveness of CNN-based classification on tabular data. By enabling a more accurate encoding of feature relationships, this approach broadens the applicability of CNNs and offers a flexible, interpretable solution for high-dimensional, structured data across disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.