Evidence mapPaperPMID 41512315Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

Perceived Use of Web-Based Videoconferencing for Social Connectedness Among Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study.

Anna Garnett, Halyna Yurkiv, Denise M Connelly, Richard Booth, Lorie Donelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna GarnettArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada, +1 519-661-2111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7111-8602
Halyna YurkivArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada, +1 519-661-2111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2193-2977
Denise M ConnellySchool of Physiotherapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-1746
Richard BoothArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada, +1 519-661-2111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0300-9954
Lorie DonelleBiobehavioral Health & Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, South Carolina, SC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9276-8639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted how restrictions on in-person interactions within long-term care homes (LTCHs) severely compromised social connectedness among older adults and their families. Post pandemic, despite policy changes supporting greater in-person family engagement, frequent outbreaks continue to disrupt face-to-face interactions, and factors such as geography, life circumstances, and health can constrain family members' ability to make regular in-person visits. Research suggests that web-based videoconferencing technology (WVT) may be a practical solution to help older adults within LTCHs to maintain social connection in the absence of physical gathering. However, increased understanding of end user experience is lacking, and more information on LTCHs' readiness to support and sustain WVT will be needed if this modality is to be successfully and widely implemented. Objective: This study aimed to understand how older adults living in LTCHs, their families, and LTCH staff members perceived the use and ease of use of WVT devices for facilitating social connectedness. Methods: Using a qualitative description approach, in-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 7 older adults, 22 family members, and 10 staff across 3 LTCHs via Zoom (Zoom Communications, Inc), Microsoft Teams, or phone calls. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis informed by the technology acceptance model. Results: Findings were structured into 3 main themes: actual system use, perceived usefulness of WVT, and perceived ease of use of WVT. Participants described using a range of WVT hardware and software to promote social connection between older adults and family members. Videoconferencing had a crucial role in supporting older adults and their family members' positive emotional state while also enabling them to maintain life and social roles such as participating in family functions. Despite the perceived use of these tools, participants were concerned about the decline in offering videoconferencing services across LTCHs post pandemic. Some participants noted shifting funding priorities toward supporting in-person recreational activities rather than diversifying web-based social connection options. In addition, factors pertaining to WVT ease of use and integration included limited staff to support older adults with different physical and cognitive needs, variability in digital literacy including knowledge about accessibility features to enhance the ease of use, and families' lack of awareness about the availability of WVT for social connectedness. Conclusions: Web-based videoconferencing technology has the potential to be a meaningful tool to reduce social isolation and promote a sense of social connectedness among older adults and their families and friends. Future research should explore how WVT could be integrated into care planning for this population, particularly in situations where older adults may be at heightened risk for social isolation. Resource allocation toward equipment, infrastructure, and family and staff training would be well-placed to increase engagement with WVT within LTCHs.

Indexed as

COVID-19InternetLong-Term CareSocial InteractionVideoconferencingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleQualitative ResearchSocial Supportlong-term careolder adultssocial connectednessvideoconferencingvirtual technologyweb-based

Identifiers

PMID41512315
PMCPMC12788786

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.