Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41512998›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Multi-stage deep learning architecture for carotid artery segmentation and stenosis evaluation: comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.

Zhiji Zheng, Wanchen Liu, Zhimeng Cui, Hui Fang, Xiao Liu, Kangyi Pan, Qingqing Lu, Kun Zhou, Xiao Luo, Xin Cao and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhiji ZhengAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Yangpu District, Shanghai, PR China.
Wanchen LiuDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China.
Zhimeng CuiDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China.
Hui FangDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China; Department of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China.
Xiao LiuDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China.
Kangyi PanDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China.
Qingqing LuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Haishu District, Ningbo, PR China.
Kun ZhouAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Yangpu District, Shanghai, PR China.
Xiao LuoAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Yangpu District, Shanghai, PR China.
Xin CaoDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Imaging for Critical Brain Diseases, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China. Electronic address: 13262566515@163.com.
Daoying GengAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Yangpu District, Shanghai, PR China; Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Imaging for Critical Brain Diseases, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China; Institute of Functional and Molecular Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Jing'an District, Shanghai, PR China. Electronic address: daoying_geng_hs@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) provides a non-invasive, radiation-free approach for evaluating stenosis caused by carotid atherosclerosis. However, manual recognition is time-consuming and inter-observer variability. We propose a novel architecture for automated segmentation and stenosis evaluation of extracranial carotid arteries by HR-MRI in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

methodsThe 641 stenotic arteries from 422 patients retrospectively collected from three tertiary hospitals were divided into a training-validation set (372 patients, 545 lesions) and an independent test set (50 patients, 96 lesions). An external validation set (89 patients, 168 lesions) was collected from the fourth tertiary hospital.

resultsThe architecture demonstrated high consistency with manual segmentation and DSA diagnostic criteria, with mean Dice similarity coefficients of 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.96 ± 0.01, and stenosis evaluation accuracies of 0.88, 0.86 on the independent test and external validation set, respectively.

conclusionThus, the proposed architecture achieved accuracy comparable to manual segmentation by physicians and demonstrated high consistency with DSA diagnostic criteria. By shortening diagnostic time and minimizing inter-observer variability, the proposed architecture is promising to offer a reliable, efficient, and intelligent tool for diagnosing head and neck atherosclerotic disease and assessing stroke risk.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionCarotid ArteriesCarotid StenosisDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexArteries stenosis diagnosisCarotid atherosclerosisComputer-assisted diagnosisDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID41512998
PMCPMC13156810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.