ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Multi-stage deep learning architecture for carotid artery segmentation and stenosis evaluation: comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) provides a non-invasive, radiation-free approach for evaluating stenosis caused by carotid atherosclerosis. However, manual recognition is time-consuming and inter-observer variability. We propose a novel architecture for automated segmentation and stenosis evaluation of extracranial carotid arteries by HR-MRI in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
methodsThe 641 stenotic arteries from 422 patients retrospectively collected from three tertiary hospitals were divided into a training-validation set (372 patients, 545 lesions) and an independent test set (50 patients, 96 lesions). An external validation set (89 patients, 168 lesions) was collected from the fourth tertiary hospital.
resultsThe architecture demonstrated high consistency with manual segmentation and DSA diagnostic criteria, with mean Dice similarity coefficients of 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.96 ± 0.01, and stenosis evaluation accuracies of 0.88, 0.86 on the independent test and external validation set, respectively.
conclusionThus, the proposed architecture achieved accuracy comparable to manual segmentation by physicians and demonstrated high consistency with DSA diagnostic criteria. By shortening diagnostic time and minimizing inter-observer variability, the proposed architecture is promising to offer a reliable, efficient, and intelligent tool for diagnosing head and neck atherosclerotic disease and assessing stroke risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.