ArticleOpen heart2026
Post-COVID-19 era heart failure diagnosis and outcomes: adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guidelines.
Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHeart failure (HF) is common with high associated morbidity and mortality. UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidelines suggest prioritising assessment by natriuretic peptide (NP) level, with patients with high NP levels assessed within 2 weeks. We evaluated adherence to NICE guidelines in the post-COVID-19 era.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective audit of consecutive referrals to a HF diagnostic pathway across seven hospitals in the West of Scotland (between 5 January and 2 June 2022). Patients were categorised by NP level according to NICE Guidelines: NT-proBNP 400-2000 ng/L (echocardiogram within 6 weeks) or >2000 ng/L (echocardiogram within 2 weeks). Time-to-echocardiogram was recorded, and 1-year outcomes (HF hospitalisation, death) were obtained from electronic records.
resultsOf the 899 patients (median age 79 years, 56% female) referred for echocardiography on the HF diagnostic pathway, 264 (29%) and 635 (71%) had an NT-proBNP >2000 ng/L and 400-2000 ng/L, respectively. Only 20 (8%) patients with NT-proBNP >2000 ng/L and 51 (8%) patients with NT-proBNP 400-2000 ng/L received an echocardiogram within the recommended timeframe. 252 (28%) patients were diagnosed with HF, 110 (42%) and 142 (22%) in the NT-proBNP >2000 ng/L and 400-2000 ng/L groups, respectively, p<0.001. One-year mortality was 12% and was higher in the >2000 ng/L NT-proBNP group at 21% compared with 9% in the 400-2000 ng/L group.
conclusionHigh NP levels identified a high-risk group who are more likely to have HF and a higher risk of mortality. Few patients received echocardiography within the NICE Guideline-recommended timeframe. Patients with high NP levels should be investigated with the same urgency as suspected cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.