Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41513406›Full record

ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2026

Deep learning for RNA secondary structure determination: gauging generalizability and broadening the scope of traditional methods.

Marcell Szikszai, Ting-Yuan Wang, Ryan Krueger, David H Mathews, Max Ward, Sharon Aviran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcell SzikszaiDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia marcell.szikszai@uwa.edu.au saviran@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0672-8222
Ting-Yuan WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2648-9532
Ryan KruegerSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6856-0248
David H MathewsDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-6557
Max WardDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9114-7339
Sharon AviranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA marcell.szikszai@uwa.edu.au saviran@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1872-9820

Funding

RNA Structure Modeling Using Physics and Sequence ComparisonR35GM145283 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DAVID H. MATHEWS · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
Prediction of nearest neighbor parameters for folding RNAs with modified nucleotidesR21GM148835 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI AVIRAN, SHARON · 2023 to 2024
$369k
NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM148835NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diverse regulatory functions, protein production capacity, and stability of natural and synthetic RNAs are closely tied to their ability to fold into intricate structures. Determining RNA structure is thus fundamental to RNA biology and bioengineering. Among existing approaches to structure determination, computational secondary structure prediction offers a rapid and low-cost strategy and is thus widely used, especially when seeking to identify functional RNA elements in large transcriptomes or screen massive libraries of novel designs. While traditional approaches rely on detailed measurements of folding energetics and/or probabilistic modeling of structural data, recent years have witnessed a surge in deep learning methods, inspired by their tremendous success in protein structure prediction. However, the limited diversity and volume of known RNA structures can impede their ability to accurately predict structures markedly different from the ones they have seen. This is known as the generalization gap and currently poses a major barrier to progress in the field. In this Perspective article, we gauge method generalizability using a new benchmark data set of structured RNAs we curated from the Protein Data Bank. We also discuss the emergence of deep learning methods for predicting structure probing data and use a new data set to underscore generalization challenges unique to this domain along with directions for future improvement. Expanding beyond improving predictive accuracy, we review how advances in deep learning have recently enabled scalable and accessible optimization of traditional structure prediction methods and their seamless integration with modern neural networks.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA FoldingRNAdeep learningRNA foldingRNA structure predictionSHAPEstructure probing

Identifiers

PMID41513406
PMCPMC12990807

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.