ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Advancing adoptive T cell therapy in ovarian cancer: barriers, innovations, and emerging platforms.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in adoptive cell therapy for ovarian cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has demonstrated curative potential in select cancers, but its translation to solid tumors such as ovarian cancer (OC) has been hindered by multiple factors, including tumor heterogeneity, immune exclusion, and a profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current ACT modalities, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, T cell receptor-engineered, and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapies, as well as emerging approaches such as bispecific T cell engager (BiTE)-secreting T cells, dual-targeting platforms, and synthetic antigen receptors. We examine their application in OC and contextualize relevant findings using insights from other solid tumors. Key barriers, including limited T cell persistence, antigen escape, and T cell exhaustion, are explored alongside strategies to enhance efficacy through cytokine armoring, checkpoint modulation, metabolic reprogramming, and gene editing. We further highlight innovations in safety engineering, including logic-gated and self-regulating synthetic circuits, to mitigate toxicity and improve precision. Additional attention is given to the evolving role of allogeneic products and in vivo engineering as scalable solutions. Finally, we emphasize the critical value of integrating high-dimensional tools such as spatial transcriptomics, single-cell profiling, and machine learning to refine ACT design, identify biomarkers of response, and support patient selection and stratification. Collectively, these advances offer a roadmap for overcoming the unique immunologic barriers to ACT in OC and accelerating the development of more potent, durable, and personalized T cell-based strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.