ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Detection and emergency management of visceral injuries after abdominal trauma : Hollow organ and mesenteric injuries-keep in mind].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hollow organ and mesenteric injuries occur in up to 7% of all cases of abdominal trauma and are linked to high morbidity and mortality, especially with delayed diagnosis and treatment. The causes include blunt, penetrating or blast injuries. Hollow organ injuries are more frequent in penetrating trauma, while injuries of the parenchymatous organs dominate in blunt trauma. The clinical diagnosis is difficult as the early symptoms are often nonspecific. Important predictors include abdominal tenderness, the seatbelt sign, leukocytosis, lactatemia and abnormalities in computed tomography (CT). The use of CT is considered the gold standard in the diagnostics but has limited sensitivity despite high specificity. Therefore, close clinical monitoring and, if necessary, repeated imaging is mandatory. Scoring systems, such as the bowel injury prediction score (BIPS) help identify injuries which require surgery. The treatment depends on the injury pattern and the condition of the patient. Stable patients without radiological signs of injury can initially be managed conservatively. Specific CT signs (e.g., pneumoperitoneum, bowel wall discontinuity) indicate the need for surgical exploration. Surgical options range from simple suturing to resection with primary anastomosis or placement of a stoma. In unstable patients damage control strategies including open abdomen therapy may be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41513814What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.