ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of a machine learning model for non-contact injury prediction based on lower limb strength asymmetry in professional football.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in sports medicine: mapping clinical tasks and assessing clinical maturity - a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Athletes' performance and injury management in sports training using association rules and data mining techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predictors of a Depression Indicator in a Large Public Dataset: Logistic Regression and Neural Network Comparison.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-contact injuries significantly impact professional football, yet traditional risk assessment methods demonstrate limited predictive accuracy. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model integrating lower limb strength asymmetry data for injury prediction. A prospective cohort study enrolled 312 professional male football players from six European clubs (2022–2024). Comprehensive isokinetic strength testing, functional assessments, and 12-month injury surveillance were conducted. Four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, SVM, GBDT, Deep Neural Networks) were developed using nested cross-validation, with performance evaluated through AUPRC, calibration, and clinical utility metrics. Temporal validation was conducted on a subsequent season cohort from the same clubs. During follow-up, 89 players (28.5%) sustained 127 non-contact injuries. Players with knee flexor asymmetry > 15% demonstrated 3.2-fold increased injury hazard (HR: 3.24, 95% CI: 2.18–4.82). The ensemble model achieved superior predictive performance (AUPRC: 0.759) compared to baseline logistic regression (0.589). Observational implementation of risk-stratified interventions was associated with 73% reduction in injury probability within four weeks. Preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis suggested €215,800 net savings per club season. Machine learning models incorporating strength asymmetry data demonstrate improved injury risk prediction performance in professional football. The observational clinical implementation framework suggests potential for effective injury prevention through personalized interventions, though randomized controlled trials are needed to establish causal relationships. These findings represent a step toward precision prevention strategies in sports medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.