ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Extracting geriatric syndromes from electronic health records: a scoping review.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGeriatric syndromes are multifactorial ageing-related presentations. There is limited consensus regarding which presentations should be considered geriatric syndromes. Clinical codes generated following healthcare contacts are commonly used to identify diverse medical conditions. It is well demonstrated that geriatric syndromes are harder to identify using codes, possibly partly due to varying definitions, although identifying information is often located in unstructured text. Accurately identifying geriatric syndromes in healthcare records may therefore require different approaches compared to more firmly defined conditions. We review how studies using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and derived databases align or differ in terms of geriatric syndromes selected for study, and how the syndromes are identified in the data sources.
methodsThe review was registered on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/9ejhq ). Databases were searched in October 2024. Of 8086 titles screened, 74 studies had full text review, and 12 studies were included.
resultsTwelve studies from 7 countries identified 31 geriatric syndromes from primary databases (N = 6) or secondary databases (N = 6) using diagnostic codes, screening tools, or free text. The five most common geriatric syndromes were falls, functional decline, incontinence, delirium and malnutrition. Thirteen geriatric syndromes were included in two or more studies. Eight studies used more than one identification method. One study used two methods for all included syndromes. KEY
conclusionsThere is heterogeneity in what presentations studies include as geriatric syndromes, and how they identify them in EHRs. It is essential that researchers clearly describe their included geriatric syndromes, reason for selection, and identification methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.