Observational studyBMC oral health2026
Sex differences in the association between tooth loss and socioeconomic status: the 8020 Promotion Foundation Study of Japanese Dental Patients.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConsidering that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and oral health status differs by sex, we examined the impact of factors such as education, economic status, employment type, and social support on tooth loss in dental patients attending clinics, separately for men and women.
methodsThis study was based on a survey of dental patients across Japan conducted by the Foundation for the Promotion of 8020 between 2014 and 2019. To determine sex differences in the association between number of teeth lost and SES, a modified Poisson regression analysis was performed with the number of lost teeth during 5 years as the dependent variable. The ratio of means (RM) was calculated separately for men and women.
resultsIn total, 1,355 participants were included in the analysis. Among women, those with fewer years of education or temporary employment had a significantly higher RM for tooth loss. Moreover, women with a higher subjective economic status or more social support had a lower RM for tooth loss. In contrast, there was no significant association between SES and tooth loss among men.
conclusionsThe association between tooth loss and SES differs by sex. Preventive strategies should consider SES-related sex differences in oral health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.