ArticleBMC public health2026
Levels of active ageing and its influencing factors among older adults: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe growing population of older adults in the 21st century has made ageing a global concern. Exploring the factors associated with active ageing is therefore of interest to further promote transitions to it among older adults.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted for this scoping review, and relevant articles were retrieved up to August 2024. The databases searched included PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Studies with quantitative, qualitative, or mixed designs were extracted. We included those that involved individuals aged 60 years or older and reported on the level and its influencing factors of active ageing. We used a health ecological model to analyse and synthesise factors influencing active ageing. In addition, all included studies were evaluated.
resultsOur search identified 23,469 studies, 65 of which were included in this review. The quality ratings were positive for 53 studies. Nineteen instruments were used to evaluate active ageing. The levels of active ageing varied widely across studies, owing to the diverse instruments used and population characteristics. Developed countries consistently reported higher levels of active ageing than developing ones. Five core themes influence active ageing: demographic profile, socioeconomic status and environment, health-related factors, psychological factors and mental health, and social connections. The demographic profile primarily encompassed intrapersonal and interpersonal factors, whereas the remaining themes reflected interactions across various levels of the health ecological model.
conclusionHigh levels of active ageing were reported in several developed countries. Providing support to help older adults better engage in active ageing can be highly beneficial.
trial registrationThis review was registered in the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Protocol (INPLASY2023120083).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.