ArticleGenome biology2026
Cross-species prediction of histone modifications in plants via deep learning.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating deep learning and pangenomics to recover missing heritability from wild structural variations.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Cross-species prediction of histone modifications in plants via deep learning.Genome biology · 2026Article
- AI-assisted crop improvement: new design tools within established regulatory frameworks.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe regulation of gene expression in plants is governed by complex interactions between cis-regulatory elements and epigenetic modifications such as histone marks. While deep learning models have achieved success in predicting regulatory features from DNA sequence, their cross-species generalizability in plants remains largely unexplored.
resultsWe systematically evaluate the ability of deep learning models to predict histone modifications across plant species using a multi-stage framework based on the Sei architecture. We train species-specific models for Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), rice (Oryza sativa), and maize (Zea mays), achieving high within-species predictive performance and strong agreement between predictions and experimental ChIP-seq profiles. However, cross-species predictions show reduced performance with increasing phylogenetic distance, highlighting limited model transferability between monocots and dicots. To improve generalization, we construct a Poaceae family-level model by jointly training on rice and maize, and an Arabidopsis-trained model based solely on Arabidopsis. These models demonstrate robust predictive power in completely unprofiled species that are not used in training set, highlighting the model's adaptability to novel plant genomes based solely on conserved regulatory syntax. In contrast, cross-family models produce less consistent results, with reliable performance only in species sharing conserved regulatory features. We also develop an easy-to-use pipeline that predicts genome-wide chromatin signals directly from DNA sequences.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that phylogenetically informed model training significantly improves cross-species epigenomic prediction, offering a scalable computational strategy for functional annotation in non-model and agriculturally important plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.