Observational studyBMC medicine2026
Trends in lipid-lowering therapies in acute coronary syndromes after Chinese new insurance policy: a real-world analysis.
Observational study in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lipid levels and risk-stratified management gaps of dyslipidemia in China.BMC medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Chinese new insurance policy for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), which made it more affordable to patients from January 1, 2022, may change lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) pattern for acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but real-world data is still lacking. This study assessed to evaluate the impact of the reimbursement policy on LLT trends and its implications.
methodsThis cohort study is based on a large, ongoing, and prospective Chinese Cardiovascular Association Database-Chest Pain Center. Between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, 789,829 patients with ACS from 4441 centers aged 18-80 years were included. Patients discharged after and before the policy were observational and control group, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at discharge, 1 month, and 3 months. Temporal trends in LLT are grouped into the 7 most common strategies: (1) high-intensity statin (HIS) monotherapy, (2) moderate-intensity statin (MIS) monotherapy, (3) MIS plus ezetimibe, (4) MIS plus PCSK9i, (5) MIS plus ezetimibe and PCSK9i, (6) ezetimibe monotherapy, and (7) PCSK9i monotherapy.
resultsA total of 789,829 (age 64 ± 10.7 years; females 37.84%) patients were included (268,089 in observational group). Temporally, MIS plus PCSK9i, MIS plus ezetimibe and PCSK9i, and PCSK9i monotherapy increased, ezetimibe monotherapy decreased, and statins keep relatively constant after the new policy. After PSM in observational group, MIS monotherapy slightly decreased (81.61% vs 89.29%, P < 0.0001) at discharge but increased in 1 month (84.54% vs 80.11%, P < 0.0001) and 3 months (82.97% vs 80.09%, P = 0.0013). MIS plus PCSK9i kept growing (0.86% vs 0.33%, P < 0.0001; 1.99% vs 0.80%, P < 0.0001; and 2.57% vs 0.60%, P < 0.0001, respectively). MIS plus ezetimibe and PCSK9i (0.15% vs 0.06%, P < 0.0001), and PCSK9i monotherapy (0.09% vs 0.03%, P < 0.0001) just increased at discharge. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment rate increased at 3 months (15.73% vs 14.02%, P = 0.0283, before PSM; 15.73% vs 13.97%, P = 0.0306, after PSM). MIS plus PCSK9i and MIS monotherapy was associated with a higher 3-month LDL-C goal attainment rate.
conclusionsThe PCSK9i reimburse policy adjustment was associated with increased intensive LLT for ACS in China, especially more PCSK9i prescription, which modestly correlated to higher LDL-C goal attainment rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.