ReviewJournal of eating disorders2026
Eating disorder symptoms and corresponding evidence-based treatments: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time to Address Eating Disorder Risk Among Medical Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Food addiction as a transdiagnostic feature associated with binge-eating symptoms in eating disorders: prevalence and rehabilitation outcomes in an Italian inpatient population.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2026Article
- The Bonny Method of Guided Imagery and Music as a trauma-informed approach in eating disorder treatment: theoretical framework and case illustrations.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders affect millions worldwide and are associated with serious medical complications, functional impairment, and increased risk of mortality. Yet current treatments are only effective for 40-55% of people, underscoring a dire need for improved and novel interventions. Limited treatment response may be due to (a) the high heterogeneity of eating disorder symptoms and (b) high rates of co-occurrence with other transdiagnostic symptoms, which are not currently addressed in standard treatments. MAIN BODY: To address this gap, recent work has adopted a symptom-focused perspective to clarify how transdiagnostic symptoms interact and maintain pathology. This approach aims to guide more personalized treatment by identifying symptoms most relevant for each individual. However, this requires a clearer understanding of how eating disorder symptoms and co-occurring symptoms relate to one another. The present review synthesizes 30 common eating disorder and co-occurring symptoms and outlines the associated evidence-based treatments. These symptom-treatment connections are derived from prior empirical symptom network analysis and organized to help clinicians and researchers better understand the functional role of each symptom and the interventions used to address them.
conclusionBy linking symptoms with their corresponding treatment approaches, this review offers a comprehensive and practical reference to support refinement of existing treatment and development of personalized, symptom-level interventions. This framework may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting targeted strategies for individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.