Trial reportBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Efficacy of phospholipid-bound omega-3 versus standard omega-3 in patients with hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06749028 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of Phospholipid-Bound Omega-3 Versus Omega-3 Alone in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Phospholipid-Bound Omega-3 Versus Omega-3 Alone in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertriglyceridemia is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and while omega-3 fatty acids (omega-3 FAs) are known to lower triglyceride (TG) concentrations, their effectiveness is influenced by formulation and bioavailability. Phospholipid-bound (PL) omega-3 FAs—such as those found in krill oil—demonstrate superior intestinal absorption and membrane integration compared with TG- and ethyl ester omega-3 FAs based forms. Preclinical studies have shown that PL omega-3 FAs exhibit anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and TG-lowering properties; however, clinical data remain limited. This pilot randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of PL omega-3 FAs with standard omega-3 FAs in patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia.
methodsWe performed a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group pilot trial involving patients aged 18–65 years with fasting TG between 150 and 499 mg/dL. Patients were randomized to receive PL omega-3 FAs (eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA) + docosahexaenoic acid [DHA), 825 mg/day) or standard omega-3 FAs (EPA + DHA, 903 mg/day). Primary outcomes were changes in fasting TG and omega-3 index (O3I) after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in lipid profile, glycemic markers, inflammatory markers, anthropometric measures, hemodynamic variables, and safety parameters.
resultsOf the 47 randomized participants, 44 (22 per group) completed the study and were included in the analysis. Mean TG levels decreased slightly in the PL group (-9.1 mg/dL) and increased in the standard group (+ 15.2 mg/dL), with no statistically significant difference between-groups (p = 0.416). Although the O3I increased significantly in both groups, the between-group difference was not statistically significant, despite a greater rise in the PL group (+ 1.78% vs. +1.50%, p = 0.446). At week 12, 36.4% of participants in the PL group achieved TG ≤ 150 mg/dL, compared with 13.6% in the standard group (p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported, and treatment adherence exceeded 95%.
conclusionsIn summary, this pilot randomized trial did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the PL and TG formulations in triglyceride or Omega-3 Index reduction. However, the numerically higher responder rate and favorable biochemical trends observed with the PL formulation warrant further investigation in larger, adequately powered studies.
trial registrationNCT06749028 (retrospectively registered on December 19, 2024, after enrollment of the first participant). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06749028 . EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY (EFSA): EFSA-2024-00030369.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.