ArticleBMC public health2026
Exploring machine learning insights into long-acting reversible family planning usage in Ethiopia: analysis of the PMA 2023 dataset.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEthiopia faces challenges in Long-Acting Reversible Family Planning (LARFP) adoption despite its efficacy. Traditional statistical methods have a limited capacity to capture nonlinear determinants. This study leverages machine learning (ML) to identify predictors of LARFP use using the 2021–2023 Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Ethiopia dataset.
methodsTwenty-four predictors across geographic, socioeconomic, healthcare access, and behavioral domains were analyzed using seven machine learning models evaluated via stratified 5-fold cross-validation.
resultsDecision Tree outperformed other models (cross-validated accuracy: 99.45%, F1: 99.55%), identifying method duration (importance = 0.35), provider type (0.25), and region (0.15) as top predictors. These findings indicate that ML methods, particularly tree-based models, outperform traditional approaches in predicting contraceptive behavior. Regional disparities were stark (SNNP: 30.59% LARFP use vs. Amhara: 15.58%). Key reasons for method choice included fewer side effects (32.3%) and long duration (15.5%).
conclusionTree-based ML models effectively captured complex determinants of LARFP use. Targeted interventions addressing regional disparities, provider training, and client-centered care (e.g., reducing side effects) are critical for improving uptake. These insights provide evidence for tailored, data-driven family planning policies that address regional and provider-level disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.