ReviewCancers2025
Molecular Classification of Endometrial Carcinomas: Review and Recent Updates.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and targeted therapies in endometrial cancer: Molecular classification-driven treatment strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Redefining the Treatment Landscape of Advanced Endometrial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Recurrent Distant Metastatic Endometrial Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab: A Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- When Immunophenotype Is Not Identity: A Clinicopathological Review of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Tumors of the Female Genital Tract.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma (EC) continues to represent a major cause of gynecologic cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Its multifactorial etiopathogenesis and underlying molecular heterogeneity have been the focus of extensive investigation. While traditional histological classification provides essential diagnostic insight, it is limited in predicting prognosis and therapeutic response due to significant interobserver variability. Recent advances in molecular biology and cancer genomics have profoundly enhanced understanding of EC pathogenesis. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project delineated four distinct molecular subtypes of EC, POLE ultra-mutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated (MSI-H), copy number low (CNL) and copy number high (CNH), each defined by unique genomic alterations, histopathologic features, and clinical behaviors. These molecular groups demonstrate significant prognostic and therapeutic implications, correlating with differential outcomes and treatment responses. This review summarizes current evidence on the genomic landscape of endometrial carcinoma and underscores the pivotal role of molecular classification in improving diagnostic accuracy, prognostic stratification, and personalized therapy. Ongoing research into molecular biomarkers holds promise for refining patient management and optimizing clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.