Evidence mapPaperPMID 41514844Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Pattern Learning and Knowledge Distillation for Single-Cell Data Annotation.

Ming Zhang, Boran Ren, Xuedong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ming ZhangAlibaba Business School, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Boran RenSchool of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Shenzhen Campus, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Xuedong LiCollege of Artificial Intelligence (CUIT Shuangliu Industrial College), Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72101069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transferring cell type annotations from reference dataset to query dataset is a fundamental problem in AI-based single-cell data analysis. However, single-cell measurement techniques lead to domain gaps between multiple batches or datasets. The existing deep learning methods lack consideration on batch integration when learning reference annotations, which is a challenge for cell type annotation on multiple query batches. For cell representation, batch integration can not only eliminate the gaps between batches or datasets but also improve the heterogeneity of cell clusters. In this study, we proposed PLKD, a cell type annotation method based on pattern learning and knowledge distillation. PLKD consists of Teacher (Transformer) and Student (MLP). Teacher groups all input genes (features) into different gene sets (patterns), and each pattern represents a specific biological function. This design enables model to focus on biologically relevant functions interaction rather than gene-level expression that is susceptible to gaps of batches. In addition, knowledge distillation makes lightweight Student resistant to noise, allowing Student to infer quickly and robustly. Furthermore, PLKD supports multi-modal cell type annotation, multi-modal integration and other tasks. Benchmark experiments demonstrate that PLKD is able to achieve accurate and robust cell type annotation.

Indexed as

batch integrationcell type annotationknowledge distillationpattern learning

Identifiers

PMID41514844
PMCPMC12785110

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.