Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Elena N PushkovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander A ArkhipovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0007-8289-0658
Nadezhda L BolshevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana A RozhminaFederal Research Center for Bast Fiber Crops, 172002 Torzhok, Russia.
Alexander A ZhuchenkoFederal Research Center for Bast Fiber Crops, 172002 Torzhok, Russia.
Elena V BorkhertEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0578-5324
Nikolai M BarsukovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0000-6303-3326
Gavriil A OleshnyaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alina V MilovanovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Olesya D MoskalenkoEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Fedor D KostromskoyEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0004-9302-8770
Elizaveta A IvankinaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6457-0609
Ekaterina M DvorianinovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5060-9912
Daiana A KrupskayaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-4231
Nataliya V MelnikovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8083-3018
Alexey A DmitrievEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6827-9584
Funding
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2025-476
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In recent years, the quality of genome assemblies has notably improved, primarily due to advances in third-generation sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools. In the present study, we obtained genome assemblies for two flax (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Progress in Flax Genome Assembly from Nanopore Sequencing Data. · full record | Socratic