ReviewNutrients2025
Sensory Characteristics of Probiotic-Containing Foods: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Enhancing Acceptability and Consumer Adherence.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technological Innovation and Consumer Trust: Understanding Safety Perceptions in Next Generation Probiotic Development.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Development, functional profiling, and probiotic evaluation of indigenous LAB from Nigerian fermented foods: Antimicrobial mechanisms, in vivo validation, and applications in food preservation and mycotoxin risk reduction.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- 3D-Printable Chontaduro (Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nanobiotic-Enhanced Probiotics for Targeted Gut Delivery: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Applications, and Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, the consumption of foods containing probiotics has increased significantly due to their well-recognized health benefits, including the modulation of gut microbiota and immune function. However, despite strong scientific support, daily massive adherence to probiotic food remains limited, mainly because of their suboptimal sensory appeal and the huge variability in consumer expectations. Sensory attributes-flavor, aroma, texture, and appearance-strongly influence liking, purchase, and the habitual consumption necessary for probiotics to exert the physiological effects for which they are consumed. The present narrative review explores the complex, multidimensional interplay between sensory features, consumer perception, and probiotic efficacy. By integrating evidence from nutritional science, microbiology, sensory science, and behavioral psychology, we outline how technological innovation and sensory optimization can improve both product acceptability and adherence. We also discuss how cross-modal perception, the cultural framework, and labeling influence hedonic responses. Finally, we highlight emerging directions, such as sensory-driven strain selection, omics-based flavor profiling, and personalized sensory nutrition, as tools to bridge the gap between scientific efficacy and consumer satisfaction. Improving the sensory design of probiotic foods is pivotal to translate microbiome science into meaningful, sustainable dietary behaviors that support the nutrition-gut-immunity axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.