ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genotype-Phenotype Analysis in Lithuanian Single-Center Cohort.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Testing Yield for Dilated Cardiomyopathy in a Single Lithuanian Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 2026 Expert Consensus Recommendations on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the Task Force of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCMs) are among the most common genetic disorders; however, they might be underdiagnosed. Sequencing core sarcomere gene panels remain the main diagnostic tool. We present the results of HCM genetic testing performed at Lithuania's tertiary care center. All patients with diagnosed or clinically suspected HCM underwent next-generation panel sequencing. Of 204 patients, 34 (16.7%) received a genetic diagnosis. The most commonly affected genes were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.