ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Assessment of Nociception and Inflammatory/Tissue Damage Biomarkers in a Post-COVID-19 Animal Model.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Five years after the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, post-COVID-19 condition continues to affect millions of subjects with persistent symptoms that significantly impair quality of life. Post-COVID-19 pain, particularly in women, has emerged as a frequent yet underestimated symptom. The validation and identification of animal models that reproduce persistent symptoms after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. The aim of the current study was to evaluate thermal nociception, biomarkers of inflammation, and nerve tissue damage in a female animal model of post-COVID-19 condition. A SARS-CoV-2 infection model was established by intranasal administration of the Omicron variant (BA.1.17 lineage) in transgenic female C57BL/6 mice expressing the human ACE2 receptor (hACE2). Nociception was assessed using the hot-plate test for 28 days post-infection. Afterwards, animals were sacrificed to analyze plasma inflammatory biomarkers by multiplex analysis. In addition, IL-6, IL-18, and IL-1β expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry to analyze neural inflammation in the saphenous nerve. The results revealed that heat nociceptive thresholds in infected mice did not significantly differ from those of non-infected, but a trend toward lower thresholds was observed in the infected group (days 14 and 28 post-infection). In addition, a slight modification in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines in plasma was detected, but no changes in the expression of IL-6, IL-1β, or IL-18 were observed in the saphenous nerve. Based on all the analyses conducted, infection with the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 did not induce thermal sensitization in animals nor alterations in the expression of inflammatory biomarkers in the saphenous nerve. Finally, a slight state of systemic inflammation was present in the infected animals. The absence of detectable changes in this animal model underscores the need for further research to clarify the discrepancies observed in human patients and to explore alternative pathways potentially involved in post-COVID-19 pain syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.