Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41516343›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

RNA-Binding Proteins in Dinoflagellates.

Mariia Berdieva, Pavel Safonov, Sergei Skarlato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariia BerdievaLaboratory of Cytology of Unicellular Organisms, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-2713
Pavel SafonovLaboratory of Cytology of Unicellular Organisms, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8558-6658
Sergei SkarlatoLaboratory of Cytology of Unicellular Organisms, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7579-7227

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 22-14-00056-Π
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The described features of dinoflagellate gene expression indicate the predominance of post-transcriptional and translational regulation over transcriptional control. These microorganisms also exhibit extensive RNA editing and distinctive splicing characteristics. This regulatory landscape underscores the central role of RNA-binding proteins in dinoflagellate biology. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on major RNA-binding protein groups identified or bioinformatically annotated in dinoflagellates, including RNA recognition motif domain-containing proteins, Sm and Sm-like family, KH domain-containing proteins, zinc-finger proteins, and Pumilio family proteins, S1 domain-containing and cold shock domain-containing proteins, DEAD/DEAH-box RNA helicases, and pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. We focus on the features of their conserved domains, their functions in eukaryotes, and available data on their presence and putative roles in dinoflagellate cells. Integrating genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic evidence, and where possible experimental data, we highlight both their overall conservation and potential lineage-specific traits. Our aim is to provide a concise synthesis of current knowledge, identify key uncertainties, and outline promising directions for future research into the evolution and cellular roles of RNA-binding proteins in this ecologically and biologically remarkable group.

Indexed as

DinoflagellidaProtozoan ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsProtozoan ProteinsRNA-Binding Proteinsconserved domainsdinoflagellategene expressionregulationRNA-binding proteins

Identifiers

PMID41516343
PMCPMC12787238

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.