ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Monitoring Training Adaptation and Recovery Status in Athletes Using Heart Rate Variability via Mobile Devices: A Narrative Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations Between Endocrine Status and Stress, Mood and Psychosomatic Status in Elite Handball Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Smartphone-Based Technologies in Equine Sports Medicine: Supporting Athlete Management-A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital twin for Taekwondo athletes: integrating sports nutrition and psychological readiness using artificial intelligence.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a non-invasive biomarker that reflects autonomic nervous system dynamics, providing valuable insights into physiological adaptation, stress, and recovery in athletes. Among the various HRV metrics, the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) has emerged as a robust and practical measure due to its strong association with parasympathetic activity, ease of calculation, and reliability in both short- and ultra-short-term recordings. This review examines the methodological considerations for using HRV to monitor training adaptations and recovery status in athletic populations. We highlight the superiority of routine, near-daily HRV measurements over isolated assessments, emphasizing the utility of weekly averages and the coefficient of variation (CV) to capture both chronic adaptations and acute homeostatic perturbations. Additionally, we discuss the selection of HRV devices, data recording procedures, and strategies to enhance athlete compliance. While RMSSD offers significant advantages for field-based monitoring, we also address its limitations, including its sole focus on parasympathetic activity and susceptibility to external confounders. Future directions include the integration of HRV data with other physiological markers and machine learning algorithms to optimize individualized training and recovery strategies. This review provides sport scientists and practitioners with evidence-based recommendations to enhance the application of HRV in both research and real-world athletic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.