ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Deep Learning-Based Multi-Lead ECG Reconstruction from Lead I with Metadata Integration and Uncertainty Estimation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a dual-branch deep learning framework for reconstructing standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) from a single-lead input. The model integrates waveform information from Lead I ECG signals with clinically interpretable metadata to enhance reconstruction fidelity and introduces predictive uncertainty estimation to improve interpretability and reliability. A publicly available dataset of 10,646 ECG records was utilized. The model combined Lead I signals with clinical metadata through two processing branches: a CNN-BiLSTM branch for time-series data and a fully connected branch for metadata. Monte Carlo dropout was applied during inference to generate uncertainty estimates. Reconstruction performance was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and root mean square error. Metadata consistently contributed to performance improvements, particularly in the QRS complexes and T-wave segments, and the proposed framework outperformed U-Net when metadata were included. Predictive uncertainty showed moderate to strong positive correlations with reconstruction errors, especially in the chest leads, and heatmaps revealed waveform regions with reduced reliability in arrhythmic and morphologically atypical cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to incorporate predictive uncertainty into ECG reconstruction. These findings suggest that combining waveform data with metadata and uncertainty quantification offers a promising approach for developing more trustworthy and clinically useful wearable ECG systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.