ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Radar Multiple Bin Selection for Breathing and Heart Rate Monitoring in Acute Stroke Patients in a Clinical Setting.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simple to use and accurate monitoring of stroke patients' breathing and heart rate in sleep is needed to lower the risk of secondary strokes and prevent worse functional outcomes due to disturbed sleep. In this study, we computed breathing and heart rates from clinical radar sleep recordings of 49 acute ischemic stroke patients. Parallel polysomnography served as the reference for evaluation. We compared radar rates computed using previously developed multiple and single range bin selection methods. Multiple selection yielded lower mean absolute errors (breathing: 0.39 vs. 0.87 breaths per min; heart rate: 0.84 vs. 3.99 beats per min) and higher correlations with the reference (breathing: 0.95 vs. 0.85; heart rate: 0.96 vs. 0.56). However, single range bin selection produced rates for a larger proportion of recording time (breathing: 93.49% vs. 73.38%; heart rate: 81.85% vs. 19.93%). Our results indicate that multiple range bin selection provides more accurate estimates of breathing and heart rate, but it has lower temporal coverage. Easy to use radar systems could facilitate the clinical adoption of contactless breathing and heart rate monitoring in sleep, improving the care provided to stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.