ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Real-Time Fluorescence-Based COVID-19 Diagnosis Using a Lightweight Deep Learning System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The coronavirus is highly contagious, making rapid early diagnosis essential. Although deep learning-based diagnostic methods using CT or X-ray images have advanced significantly, they still face limitations in cost, processing time, and radiation exposure. In addition, for the possibility of real-time COVID-19 diagnosis, model lightweighting is required. This study proposes a lightweight deep learning model for COVID-19 diagnosis based on fluorescence images and demonstrates its applicability in embedded environments. To prevent data imbalance caused by noise and experimental variations, images were preprocessed using Gray Scale conversion, CLAHE, and Z-Score normalization to equalize brightness values. Among the tested architectures-VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet-ResNet152 and VGG13 achieved the highest accuracies of 97.25% and 93.58%, respectively, and were selected for lightweighting. Layer-wise importance was calculated using an imprinting-based method, and less important layers were pruned. The pruned VGG13 maintained its accuracy while reducing model size by 18.9 MB and parameters by 4.2 M. ResNet152 (Prune 39) improved accuracy by 1% while reducing size by 161.5 MB and parameters by 40.22 M. The optimized model achieved 129.97 ms, corresponding to 7.69 frames per second (FPS) on an NPU(Furiosa AI Warboy), proving real-time COVID-19 diagnosis is feasible even on low-power edge devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.