ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bias at the Bedside: A Comprehensive Review of Racial, Sexual, and Gender Minority Experiences and Provider Attitudes in Healthcare.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with gay-affirmative practice among polish paramedics: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPersistent inequities in healthcare experiences and outcomes among marginalized racial/ethnic groups and sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations have been well documented. However, disparities in perceptions of discrimination and bias between patients and health providers remain insufficiently understood. This review synthesizes the current evidence on how these groups differently perceive discrimination, how bias manifests in clinical encounters, and how intersecting identities shape healthcare experiences.
methodsA comprehensive review using SANRA guidelines examined racial/ethnic discrimination, SGM-related bias, provider implicit attitudes, minority stress processes, and structural determinants of inequity in healthcare settings. Articles were identified through systematic search strategies across major databases, and their conceptual, methodological, and theoretical contributions were analyzed.
resultsAcross studies, marginalized patients consistently reported discrimination, stigma, and mistrust in healthcare, whereas providers often underestimated the prevalence and impact of these experiences. Evidence indicates that implicit pro-White biases among providers influence communication quality, clinical decision-making, and patient comfort. Structural racism and intersecting minority statuses further compound disparities, contributing to delayed care, unmet health needs, and poorer outcomes. Limited alignment between patient and provider perceptions suggests a gap in recognition of inequitable treatment and its drivers.
conclusionsHealthcare inequities arise from interconnected, interpersonal, and structural mechanisms. Addressing these disparities requires multilevel interventions targeting provider training, institutional policy reform, and system-level barriers. Integrating both patient and provider perspectives is essential for developing equitable, affirming models of care and improving health outcomes for racial/ethnic and SGM populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.