ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Endometriosis and Reproductive Sparing Surgery: A Narrative Review and AGREE II-S-Based Evaluation of International Guidelines.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical management of endometriosis: surgical techniques, adjuvant therapy, and long-term management Number 10 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Review
- Surgical management of endometriosis: indications, patient preparation, and perioperative planning: Number 6 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Article
- Improved Outcomes with Nerve-Sparing Technique: A Retrospective Comparison of Colorectal Surgeries for Bowel Endometriosis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Diagnosis and management of endometriosis-associated infertility Number 4 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is a complex disease that may affect a woman's fertility and quality of life. Owing to substantial variations in symptom severity, lesion distribution, and reproductive impact, its management presents considerable clinical challenges. The most recent internationally recognized guidelines include those issued by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE, 2022), the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG/SGGG/OEGGG S2k, 2025), the World Endometriosis Society (WES), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2024), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, reaffirmed 2022). To provide a comprehensive overview of these recommendations, we critically compared these guidelines, with particular emphasis on the recently updated German S2k guideline. Searches were conducted through PubMed and institutional repositories using selected key terms, and the AGREE II tool (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) was employed to assess methodological quality. Key clinical domains examined included indications for conservative and radical surgery, management of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), the role of surgery before Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), the impact of second-look procedures, and integration of psychosocial dimensions via Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). The results show a general trend toward interdisciplinary treatment models, cautious use of radical resection techniques, and customized, symptom-based surgical interventions. Despite ongoing disagreements, there is general agreement on collaborative decision-making, preserving fertility, and adjusting surgery time and technique between the guidelines to meet the requirements of individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.