ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Machine Learning Analysis of Retrospective Data From 503 Hospitalized Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes to Identify Factors Associated With Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes is increasingly prevalent among older adults; mild cognitive impairment (MCI) comorbidity in this group represents a major concern. Existing MCI prediction methods are often inaccurate, but machine learning (ML) offers improved potential. This study aimed to identify factors associated with MCI through ML analysis of retrospective data from hospitalized older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study analyzed data from 503 inpatients older than 60 years with T2DM. Patients were classified into MCI (n=102) and normal (n=401) groups based on Mini-Mental State Examination scores. To minimize overfitting and maximize data utilization, 5-fold cross-validation was used for model training and evaluation. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified 8 core predictors from clinical data. Logistic regression, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and random forest algorithms were employed to construct predictive models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare model performance. RESULTS Key predictors of early MCI included age, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, waist-to-height ratio, presence of diabetic complications, diabetes duration exceeding 5 years, and low education level. The XGBoost model outperformed other algorithms in ROC analysis: area under the curve, 0.892±0.032; accuracy, 0.851±0.028; sensitivity, 0.843±0.031; specificity, 0.859±0.029; and F1 score, 0.834±0.033. CONCLUSIONS The XGBoost model, incorporating these identified factors, demonstrated optimal predictive performance for MCI in older patients with T2DM. It may aid clinical risk stratification and provide a quantitative foundation for early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.