Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41518067›Full record

ReviewHippocampus2026

From Synaptic Plasticity and Critical Periods to Social Behavior and Stress: Getting to, and Staying in, CA2.

Serena M Dudek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Serena M DudekNeurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4094-8368

Funding

Synaptic Plasticity In The Adult And Developing NSZ01ES100221 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DUDEK, SERENA M · 2002 to 2008
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES100221NIEHS NIH HHS Z01-ES100221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal Area CA2, with some exceptions, had long been neglected in in vivo studies, due largely to its small size, and in in vitro studies because of its general similarity to CA3 and CA1. Increasing evidence showing that CA2 was molecularly distinct led to the increased appreciation of CA2 as a separate region, and as such, that it likely had functions that were dissimilar from its neighboring CA subfields that were worth studying. Indeed, it was the molecules that are enriched in CA2 that provided inspiration for many of the functional studies. In this article, I provide a personal account of how I got interested in CA2 and describe how I viewed our discoveries in the context of the others in the field. As it happened, much of my earlier work on synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and visual cortex had everything to do with why I felt compelled to ask the question, "are CA2 synapses resistant to long-term potentiation?." In fact, we are a product of our training and our environment when we are considering research directions.

Indexed as

CA2 Region, HippocampalCritical Period, PsychologicalNeuronal PlasticitySocial BehaviorStress, PsychologicalSynapsesAnimalsHumansLong-Term Potentiation

Identifiers

PMID41518067
PMCPMC12789960

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.