ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
Pharmacovigilance study and development of a clinical decision flowchart for personalized selection of trastuzumab, T-DXd, and T-DM1 in breast cancer patients.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTrastuzumab, the first anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted drug, is limited by adverse drug events (ADEs). The next-generation antibody-drug conjugates trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) exhibit enhanced efficacy and safety profiles compared with trastuzumab. In this study, we utilized US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to compare the ADEs of all three drugs, to facilitate personalized clinical decision-making and targeted monitoring.
methodsADE reports for patients with breast cancer using trastuzumab, T-DXd, or T-DM1 were retrieved. ADEs were classified using preferred terms (PT), standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs), and system organ classes (SOCs). Data mining using reported odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker was conducted.
resultsOverall, 20,829 cases of trastuzumab, 4565 cases of T-DXd, and 2975 cases of T-DM1 were included. With regard to SMQ terms, trastuzumab had a higher signal intensity for cardiac toxicity, and the RORs for "cardiomyopathy" of trastuzumab, T-DXd and T-DM1 were 8.59, 1.33, and 1.84, respectively. Meanwhile, T-DXd showed stronger signals for lung toxicity and T-DM1 showed prominent hepatotoxicity signals. Based on the differences between trastuzumab, T-DXd and T-DM1, this study established an individualized medication selection flowchart.
conclusionsThis study applied four algorithms to analyze and compare ADEs associated with trastuzumab, T-DXd, or T-DM1. By integrating multi-level analysis including PT, SMQ, and SOC, this study provides a comprehensive safety perspective to guide clinical decision-making and medication monitoring for patients with breast cancer receiving HER2-targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41518486What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.