ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Effect of risk management strategies on nursing quality and patient satisfaction in the operating room: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative Nursing Management of Unintended Retained Foreign Object-Related Events in Neurosurgery: Insights From a 16-Year Study in China.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning models integrating attention mechanisms in operating room nursing quality and postoperative risk assessment for tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis research evaluated the effectiveness of risk management strategies in enhancing nursing management quality and improving patient satisfaction in the operating room setting.
methodsA quasi-experimental design was adopted to compare outcomes between two patient groups in the operating room. The observation group (n = 49) received nursing care guided by structured risk management protocols, while the routine group (n = 42) received conventional nursing management. Outcome indicators included the incidence of nursing-related risk events, comprehensive nursing quality scores (covering basic care, aseptic practices, documentation quality, item management, and safety protocols), nursing staff's risk management cognition (awareness, attitude, and behavior), and patient satisfaction levels.
resultsCompared to the routine group, the observation group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of nursing risk events (P < 0.05). Scores for nursing quality across all domains-including aseptic practices and safety management-were markedly higher in the risk-managed group (P < 0.05). Nursing staff in the observation group also exhibited enhanced risk cognition, more proactive attitudes, and stronger risk management behaviors (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patient satisfaction scores were significantly improved in the risk-managed group.
conclusionImplementation of structured risk management strategies in the operating room leads to measurable improvements in nursing quality, enhances staff risk awareness and practices, and significantly boosts patient satisfaction. These findings support broader integration of risk-based nursing protocols into perioperative care systems to ensure safer and higher-quality patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.