Evidence mapPaperPMID 41519797Full record

Trial reportNature communications2026

Once and thrice weekly interval training in adults with central obesity: a randomized controlled trial.

Parco M Siu, Chit K Leung, Joshua D K Bernal, Angus P Yu, Francesco Recchia, Bjorn T Tam, Daniel Y T Fong, Derwin K C Chan, Heidi H Ngai, Chi H Lee and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04887454 (Optimal Frequency of High-Intensity Interval Training for Centrally Obese Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04887454 nacompletednot on this map

Optimal Frequency of High-Intensity Interval Training for Centrally Obese Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2024Enrolled315ConditionsObesityArmsOnce-Weekly HIIT, Thrice-Weekly HIIT, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Parco M Siu *Division of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. pmsiu@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-5058
Chit K Leung *Division of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1997-0450
Joshua D K Bernal *Division of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-5880
Angus P YuDivision of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Francesco RecchiaDivision of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Bjorn T TamAcademy of Wellness and Human Development, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Daniel Y T FongSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7365-9146
Derwin K C ChanSchool of Arts and Social Sciences, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China.
Heidi H NgaiDietetic Clinic, School of Professional and Continuing Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chi H LeeDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Patrick S H YungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Stephen H S WongDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-4545
Martin GibalaDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

HKU | University Research Committee, University of Hong Kong (HKU Research Committee) Seed Fund for Basic ResearchResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) GRF 17105920Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) GRF 17110722Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) GRF 17112223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a global public health crisis that is aggravated and mirrored by the high prevalence of physical inactivity. This single-center, assessor-blinded, three-group, randomized controlled trial in Hong Kong examined the therapeutic value of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) delivered in one session per week via a "weekend warrior" approach versus three sessions per week for reducing body adiposity in adults with overweight and central obesity. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to once-weekly HIIT (H1), thrice-weekly HIIT (H3), and control (CON) groups (n = 105 per group). The interventions lasted for 16 weeks. The HIIT groups performed a total of 75 minutes of HIIT per week (either in one session or three sessions), while the control group received biweekly health education classes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 16, and week 32. The primary outcome was the change in total body fat mass from baseline to week 16. Secondary outcomes were reported in the main text. Compared to CON at week 16, both HIIT groups showed decreased fat mass (adjusted mean differences: H1 vs. CON: -0.8 kg [95% CI: -1.4 to -0.2], P = 0.0107; H3 vs. CON: -1.0 kg [95% CI: -1.6 to -0.5], P = 0.0003). No study-related adverse events were reported. Here, we show that HIIT, performed once- or thrice-weekly, is safe and reduces fat mass in adults with overweight and central obesity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04887454.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingObesity, AbdominalAdiposityAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41519797
PMCPMC12881463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.