ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimal weight gain to reduce obesity risk in preterm infants in a National cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to identify the optimal postnatal weight gain through age 6 to prevent obesity in preterm infants. Nested case-control study using a nationwide South Korean cohort (2008–2015) included preterm infants with obesity (cases) and those with BMI between the 5th–85th percentiles (controls) at age 6. Weight-for-age and BMI z-scores were compared using Cohen’s d. Logistic regression identified obesity risk factors, and net benefit analysis determined optimal intervention points by birth weight. Among 41,286 preterm infants, 3349 (8.1%) developed obesity. Birth weight z-score differences between cohorts were small (Cohen’s d = 0.115), but differences in weight-for-age z-scores emerged at 4–6 months (Cohen’s d = 0.474) and grew over time (3 years: Cohen’s d = 1.278). Risk factors included low gestational age, high birth weight, rural residence, lower socioeconomic status, and recent birth. Higher z-scores correlated with greater net benefit, with extremely low birth weight infants showing earlier increases. In conclusion, a rapid increase in z-scores from 4 to 6 months was strongly linked to obesity at 6 years. Optimal predictive values varied by birth weight, emphasizing the need for early monitoring and tailored cut-off values for z-scores based on corrected age to prevent obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.